LIABILITY FOR PERPETRATORS OF THE TRANSFER OF FIDUCIARY OBJECTS WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE FIDUCIARY RECIPIENT

Authors

  • Feby Chintya Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • Bambang Hartono Universitas Bandar Lampung

Keywords:

Responsibility; Perpetrator; Crime; Transfer of Objects.

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate the liability of individuals who transfer fiduciary assets without the consent of the recipient, as Decision Number 148/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Tjk. The research methods used are normative juridical approaches and empirical approaches, the data used are secondary data and primary data with qualitative analysis in order to obtain a correct and objective research result. The result of the research is the responsibility of the perpetrator of the crime of transferring the fiduciary object without the consent of the fiduciary recipient, namely stating that the Defendant Glenn Kurniawan Bin Tekandar Kurniawan has been proven legally and convincingly guilty of committing the crime of "Transferring the object of Fiduciary Guarantee without prior written consent from the Fiduciary Recipient" as in the First alternative indictment; Sentencing the Defendant therefore to imprisonment for 10 (ten) months and a fine of IDR 1,000,000,- (one million rupiah),;Ordered that the aforementioned imprisonment shall not be served, unless in the future by a Judge's decision another order is given on the grounds that the Convict before the probation period of 1 (one) year expires commits a punishable act; stipulated that the Defendant shall remain in custody; and stipulated that the defendant shall be burdened to pay court costs in the amount of IDR 2.000,00 (two thousand rupiah). It is suggested that law enforcement officials impose the maximum penalty on perpetrators to serve as a deterrent for future offenders and as a lesson for those who may consider committing similar acts.

References

Arsyad, J. H. (2022). Fenomena Flexing di Media Sosial dalam Aspek Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Cakrawala Informasi, 2(1), 10–28.

Chazawi, A. (2022). Hukum Pidana Positif Penghinaan. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).

Dendy, D. A. D. S. R., & Ramasari, R. D. (2022). Analisis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Anak Yang Melakukan Pungutan Liar (Studi Pada Lembaga Perlindungan Anak Lampung Tengah). Jurnal Hukum Dan Etika Kesehatan, 95–107.

Faisal Riza, S. H., MH, C. P. L., ASMADI, E., & SH, M. H. (2023). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. umsu press.

Farid, R. N., & Hasan, Z. (2022). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan Terhadap Karyawan Toko Erafone Megastore Cabang Mall Kartini Bandar Lampung (Studi Putusan Nomor 569/Pid. B/2021/Pn Tjk). Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 2(1), 319–328.

Ismunandar, A. (2020). Dinamika Sosial dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Transformasi Sosial Masyarakat. Tarbawiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3(2), 205–219.

Javier, A. R., Erlina, E., & Safitri, M. S. (2022). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENDIRIAN BANGUNAN TANPA IZIN DI ATAS TANAH TANPA ALAS HAK PADA LOKASI WISATA KAMPUNG VIETNAM. Case Law, 3(1), 39–51.

Lanongbuka, B. (2020). Wewenang Penuntut Umum Melakukan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, 9(4).

Nafisah, K., & Nursiti, N. (2018). Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Yang Dilakukan Oleh Suami Terhadap Istri. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, 2(3), 586–595.

Nusantara, H. U. (2021). Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Berdasarkan Pasal 372 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 136–144.

Raradanti, L., Mahzaniar, M., Maryani, H., & Nasution, A. (2023). The Role of Investigators Civil Servants of North Sumatera Province in the Framework of Activities of Illegal Logging Criminal Actions. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 11(1), 116–127.

Rusli, T., & Martquardo, A. B. (2021). DESKRIPSI ANALISIS TINDAK PIDANA TENTANG KEKERASAN SEKSUAL YANG MENGANCAM BERSETUBUH DI LUAR PENIKAHAN. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, 3(02), 101–111.

Sahabuddin, S., Saputra, W., & Mahila, S. (2022). Mencari Akar Rumput Kejahatan Begal oleh Pelaku Muda dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hukum dan Rasa Aman Masyarakat Kota Jambi. Wajah Hukum, 6(2), 499–506.

Sihombing, E. I. P. P. (2020). PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN NO. 12/PID. PRA/PN. MND (STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DALAM KASUS PENGGELAPAN DOKUMEN KAPAL). LEX CRIMEN, 8(12).

Situmeang, S. M. T. (2021). Buku Ajar Krimonologi. PT Rajawali Buana Pusaka.

Sururiyah, L. (2017). Tinjauan Kriminologi terhadap Suami Pelaku Penganiayaan dalam Rumah Tangga. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 328–350.

Tahir, B. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Menurut Hukum Pidana Tentang Daya Paksa (Overmacht). E-Jurnal SPIRIT PRO PATRIA, 4(2), 115–124.

Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2019). Kenakalan Anakdalam Fenomena Balapan Liardi Kota Singaraja Dalam Kajian Kriminologi. Jurnal Advokasi, 9(1).

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01

How to Cite

Feby Chintya, & Bambang Hartono. (2023). LIABILITY FOR PERPETRATORS OF THE TRANSFER OF FIDUCIARY OBJECTS WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE FIDUCIARY RECIPIENT. Journal of Management, Business and Social Sciences, 1(1), 125–135. Retrieved from https://journal.ubl.ac.id/index.php/mabuss/article/view/74